Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘mccain’

I went to my first rally last night. Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were in Kissimmee, Florida and luckily they held the rally at 11pm or I wouldn’t have been able to go.

35,000 strong is how many people the Orlando Sentinel reports were there.

They came out like old pals. They laughed at each other’s jokes and whispered to each other like new lovers. I heard Obama’s speech was going to be the same – parts of it were, of course, but the rest really wasn’t.

We all remember how great and prosperous our country was under Bill Clinton – what a guy, what a President! It just so happens he needed his dick sucked a little too badly. Unfortunately, he gave the Republicans ammunition against him. He lied under oath.

As a side note, a funny comparison…have you noticed that Bush won’t speak under oath? He lies so much that the Republicans would fall over themselves having to try and defend him from impeachment – that’s why the fucker’s still in office.

We all know how great Clinton was for our economy with each family earning $7,000 more than they were before him. He had some great lines and he’s definitely a looker so that helps. But it was the relationships that struck me. Sure, I loved when Barack said, “Bush has dug us a hole and now he just wants to hand the shovel to McCain” because it’s a great visual and oh, so true, but it was nothing to the looks Barack and Billy gave each other.

I know, I know, Republicans hate Bill Clinton. But no one can deny that our country prospered under his executive leadership. He made this country a glowing example to the rest of the world and he was an economic genius – exactly the type of guy I want to see Barack palling around with, especially at a time like this. It was a gorgeous site:

The man is everywhere – as someone once said, he really is like Visa, everywhere you want to be. Last night, I count 3 places: 1) his infomercial


Doesn’t it look like he was already sitting in the oval office? There should be no question now about what this man would do as President.

2) the rally

(“Who makes less than $250,000 per year? We do!”)

3) the Daily Show with Jon Stewart

A man who surrounds himself with people like Bill Clinton, Warren Buffett and the always great Joe Biden is a man who wants to do great things and wants to get the right answers before jumping into something like the economic crisis head-first.

A man who surrounds himself with someone who called us a nation of whiners and said that we are in a mental recession is not the type of person I want working on our economy.

Bring us back to the days of prosperity and leadership in the world. It is time to heal and put someone in office who has the judgment to lead.

I may still be a little pumped from the rally so for the first and only time I will ever say it outright on here – OBAMA ’08!

Read Full Post »

We all heard of Joe the “Plumber”. He first came up those 25 times he was mentioned in the last debate. Then we find out that his father was connected to the Keating 5, that he’s not really a plumber, but more of a plant by the republicans. And that’s fine. They can plant people all they want, networks like CNN are trying really hard to be unbiased and research things like this so we can finally know the truth.

Well, today, John McCain and Joe the Plumber were scheduled to speak together. Apparently, someone forgot to tell Johnny that Joe decided not to show

Maybe the should’ve asked “Joe Six-Pack” to be there as a backup, just in case…

According to CNN, he just didn’t go. There was some sort of communication breakdown. No way! John McCain miscommunicate? Nooooooooooooooo!

Man, I love Maine!

Read Full Post »

This was posted in a Myspace bulletin and I just had to share it, its SO obvious that the McCain camp are getting desperate! (thanks for the bulletin Anne!)

Dozens Of Call Center Workers Walk Off Job In Protest Rather Than Read McCain Script Attacking Obama
By Greg Sargent – October 27, 2008, 5:18PM

Some three dozen workers at a telemarketing call center in Indiana walked off the job rather than read an incendiary McCain campaign script attacking Barack Obama, according to two workers at the center and one of their parents.

Nina Williams, a stay-at-home mom in Lake County, Indiana, tells us that her daughter recently called her from her job at the center, upset that she had been asked to read a script attacking Obama for being “dangerously weak on crime,” “coddling criminals,” and for voting against “protecting children from danger.

Williams’ daughter told her that up to 40 of her co-workers had refused to read the script, and had left the call center after supervisors told them that they would have to either read the call or leave, Williams says. The call center is called Americall, and it’s located in Hobart, IN.

“They walked out,” Williams says of her daughter and her co-workers, adding that they weren’t fired but willingly sacrificed pay rather than read the lines. “They were told [by supervisors], ..If you all leave, you’re not gonna get paid for the rest of the day.

The daughter, who wanted her name withheld fearing retribution from her employer, confirmed the story to us. “It was like at least 40 people,” the daughter said. “People thought the script was nasty and they didn’t wanna read it.

A second worker at the call center confirmed the episode, saying that “at least 30″ workers had walked out after refusing to read the script.

“We were asked to read something saying [Obama and Democrats] were against protecting children from danger,” this worker said. “I wouldn’t do it. A lot of people left. They thought it was disgusting.

This worker, too, confirmed sacrificing pay to walk out, saying her supervisor told her: “If you don’t wanna phone it you can just go home for the day.

The script coincided with this robo-slime call running in other states, but because robocalling is illegal in Indiana it was being read by call center workers.

Representatives at Americall in Indiana, and at the company’s corporate headquarters in Naperville, Illinois, didn’t return calls for comment.

Read Full Post »

Now I buy coffee from 7-Election all the time, and of course, I buy the Obama one:D

And the results so far are in!

7-Election Coffee drinkers weigh in on the ‘08 US Presidential race with every coffee purchase by choosing between a Obama cup of coffee and a McCain cup of coffee at U.S. 7 Eleven stores. Which coffee you will buy? Till now Obrama 59.68% Vs McCain 40.32%. (see map below) A funny way to see some statistics.

Read Full Post »

I am sick and fucking tired of ignorant people being the tone of the McCain campaign. I’m irate that John McCain and Sarah Palin started talking about Obama as though he were a terrorist. We always knew that fearmongering would be part of the GOP platform, but this? This is emotional terrorism. Yes, I said it. They are trying to terrorize our emotions and our deepest fears by lying and pointing out things that are ludicrous and threatening someone’s life. Kill him, bomb him, he’s a terrorist, an Arab, a Muslim. We do not need this bullshit in our politics. Our country is headed down the shitter and people are talking about murdering the one man who even seems to have any clue how to fix it.

Sure, John McCain took the microphone away from a woman who called Obama an Arab. Does that stop him from instilling people with doubts anyway? No. “We need to know who the real Obama is.” We DO know who the real Obama is. Who the hell are you, John? Besides, of course, a liar and a being who feeds on the fears of others.

And John McCain is PROUD of these people. In last night’s debate he said, “I’m proud of the people that come to our rallies….there have been things yelled at your rallies, Senator Obama, that I’m not happy about either”. Like what? Has anyone threatened John McCain’s life at an Obama rally? Anyone? No! John McCain has to say he’s proud of these people because they’re the only ones he has left. And heaven knows, we don’t want to scare away the racist nutjobs. After all, they get to vote too.

John McCain brought up Rep. John Lewis and his statement that McCain and Palin are “sowing the seeds of hatred”. And he’s right! Why hasn’t McCain said that Sarah Palin’s statement about Obama palling around with Bill Ayers is ridiculous slander? For someone whose Keating 5 skeletons are scarier than any supposed involvement Obama could have possibly had when he was 8 years old (the time Ayers was with Weather Underground), don’t you think you might just want to keep your mouth shut about questionable associations?

It’s all about a snowball effect. You start with the small lies: “Obama called Palin a pig”. Move to bigger lies: “Obama wants to teach sex to Kindergartners” and then it becomes “Obama pals with terrorists”. John McCain’s campaign seems to be run by the worst kind of people: lying, unethical, emotional terrorists. We are in the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression and what McCain has at his rallies aren’t people concerned about this – they are people concerned about killing and bombing Barack Obama. He is a Christian, American citizen. How anyone gets away with saying such threatening and terrible things about someone who has been serving our country, has a family who needs him, and is only trying to help this country gets back on his feet is beyond me.

Barack Obama is not the terrorist, Mr. McCain. Your supporters are. Stop NOW before something happens that you can not reverse because you failed to repudiate your own VP.

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! Stop the hate, stop the racism, and stop praising your supporters who are encouraging violence and murder. Be the man we saw in 2000 and have some fucking conviction for what’s right, not just what you think is right for you. Because, Senator McCain, what seems to be right for you is wrong for the rest of us. So practice what you preach and put the COUNTRY FIRST!

Read Full Post »

Obama said the below at a political rally in Philadelphia, does anyone else get goosebumps reading this?

“But here’s the thing Philadelphia. They can run misleading ads, and pursue the politics of anything goes, they can try to change the subject. They can do that what they want to do because the American people understand what’s going on — but it’s not going to work. Not this time.”

Read Full Post »

Well, I was figuratively flipping through the news of the web pages and came across an article regarding Rosie O’Donnell’s return to t.v. She plans on hosting a variety show (co-produced by another stand-up comedian) that will air in the near future. This set my train of thought in motion this early morn.

At first, I thought I let my first blog entry be about Rosie’s return (sparking my entertainment-themed blog), which would be hard to do without mentioning her last t.v. appearance (her much publicized exit from The View on ABC). That would get me started talking politics for sure (which I’m trying to avoid…Not because I can’t…my “boss” says I can write about anything but there is already someone cornering the political market. We can do without the political saturation). 

So, I decided to compromise with myself and write a semi-political but mostly entertainment related article about celebrities and politics. If you look back, you’ll see that celebrities get hammered by the public over voicing thier political views. If you look closer, you’ll notice it is mostly conservative republicans who have a problem with liberal celebrities. They tend to get real childish, too. All of a sudden The Dixie Chicks have no singing ability (although country music fans made 2 of thier albums some of the best-sellers of all time and they won several major awards). Susan Sarandon can’t act (though she has a slew of hit movies) and Rosie O is a horrible person (though she’s won major awards, had a few hit movies, and has given more money away to needy families, children, and the general public than most other celebrities).

The fact is, people aren’t mad because celebrities are speaking thier mind. Republicans are only upset with the ones that don’t agree with them. I mean, fans weren’t burning Toby Kieth’s cd’s when he produced that juvenile and violence-promoting “Courtesy of the Red, White, and Blue” (which came close to being a bit racist).

The thing is, celebrities are just people that the media follows around. We shouldn’t be mad at them. They speak their mind just like the rest of us non-celebrities do. It’s just that no one is really listening to us…

So sing on, Dixie Chicks. Speak up, Sharon Stone. And as for Rosie…well, I hope that she steers clear of political humor. Not because I disagree, but I want America to love her again.

On a side note; McCain has done everything in his power to stall the “Getting To Know You” part of his campaign. He says that he went to Washinton to help in this crisis, but he doesn’t understand that we have a very small window before elections. We NEEDED the debates in order to help us make a decision. However, it wasn’t just the debates that he has avoided. My first thought was, he didn’t want America to learn something about Sarah Palin or that he is trying to protect her from the “big bad media” due to her gender and lack of experience. But considering where she is from, I think it is much much more than that.

Read Full Post »

This is just plain fucking scary! If our country wasn’t fucked before…it certainly is now!

WASHINGTON —  Negotiations on a $700 billion bailout of Wall Street descended into partisan bickering on Monday after a failed House vote sent stocks spiraling down more than 700 points in intraday trading.

The House quickly divided into hostile camps on what had intended to be a bipartisan bill, with both sides saying the other had not held up its end of the bargain. Indeed 40 percent of Democrats and two-thirds of Republicans opposed the legislation in the 205-228 vote against the bill.

Republicans were quick to blame House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for the bill’s failure, saying a pre-vote speech in which she criticized the Bush administration’s handling of the economy had turned Republican votes against the bailout.

“This is not a partisan crisis, this is an economic crisis,” said Deputy Minority Whip Rep. Eric Cantor, who said that 94 Democrats also refused to go along with the bill. He described the vote as the result of “Speaker Pelosi’s failure to listen and failure to lead.”

House Republican Conference Chairman, Rep. Adam Putnam of Florida, said “he was disappointed that the process that yielded a bipartisan approach took a very marked, partisan tone at the end of the debate.”

But House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass., took umbrage with that claim.

“Because somebody hurt their feelings they decide to punish the country. … I mean, that’s hardly plausible<” said Frank. noting that the number of Republicans insulted was the same needed to pass the legislation. “I’ll make an offer. Give me those 12 people’s names and I will go talk uncharacteristically nicely to them.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told FOX News that Democrats knew how tenuous the bill was they shouldn’t have played with fire.

“Congressman Frank is funny and clever but there’s nothing clever about this. Why would you poison the well right before the vote is about to take place?” he asked.

In her speech, Pelosi asked lawmakers to swallow hard and support the legislation. But she also piled on the administration.

“When was the last time someone asked you for $700 billion?” Pelosi asked in a floor speech shortly before the vote. “It is a number that is staggering, but tells us only the costs of the Bush administration’s failed economic policies — policies built on budgetary recklessness, on an anything goes mentality, with no regulation, no supervision and no discipline in the system.”

Without commenting on her criticism or the GOP response, Pelosi said that Republicans have not received the message from the White House that bipartisanship was needed.

“We delivered on our side of the bargain,” Pelosi said, congratulating Democratic leaders for getting 60 percent of the caucus to support the White House bill. “We extend a hand of cooperation to the White House, to the Republicans so we can get this issue resolved”

At the White House, President Bush was resuming talks with his economic team, including Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, to determine the next steps. In a meeting with Ukrainian President Viktor Yushenko, Bush urged both sides to get back to the drawing board.

“I was disappointed in the vote of the United State Congress on the economic rescue plan. We put forth a plan that was big because we got a big problem. I’m going to be talking to my economic advisers after my meeting here with the president. and we’ll work with members of Congress on the way forward. Our strategy is to continue to address this economic situation head on, and we’ll be working on developing a strategy that will enable us to move forward,” he said.

With the start of Rosh Hashanah at sundown on Monday, lawmakers had decided to stay in session to look for a solution, though Frank, Cantor and other Jewish lawmakers were unlikely to be involved in the negotiations.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said Democrats will take a look at what to do next.

“We did our part,” said Hoyer of Maryland. “As I said on the floor, this is a bipartisan responsibility and we think (Democrats) met our responsibility.”

Asked whether majority Democrats would try to reverse the stunning defeat, Hoyer said, “We’re certainly not going to abandon our responsibility. We’ll continue to focus on this and see what actions we can take.”

The bailout bill had aimed to open up clogged credit lines for financial markets that had come to a near collapse. Sellers continued to shed stocks as the market teetered down more than 730 points after the vote ended.

The legislation had been a tough swallow for many lawmakers, who saw government coming to the rescue of an out-of-control financial market that had played fast and loose with housing loans.

Representatives worked throughout the weekend to make a bill palatable. Republicans had insisted on a mortgage securities insurance paid by firms who had invested in bad housing loans. That was included in the bill voted on Monday as were provisions to prevent executives from getting massive severence packages, additional congressional oversight, more transparency and accountability and a means to let the taxpayer get back its investment before shareholders.

But many lawmakers continued to oppose the plan for a variety of reasons, including the massive price tag that would expand the national debt, and GOP members said their constituents were calling 10-1 in opposition to the bill, which had been described as too much government intervention.

House leaders held open the vote as they tried to sway reluctant lawmakers to support the plan. Arm-twisting continued even after the vote clock expired. One member, retiring Republican Rep. Jerry Weller, did not vote.

A White House spokesman said administration officials will meet and then contact congressional leaders.

“The crisis we are facing remains,” said White House Deputy Spokesman Tony Fratto, who added, “We’re obviously disappointed.”

Fratto said that he thinks many Americans were mistaken by believing that the bill was a “bailout of Wall Street.” Instead, he said the bill was to prevent a large economic crisis.

“Nobody wants to bail out Wall Street, and we understand Americans might be opposed to bailing out Wall Street … This is not a bailout,” he said. “We hope Americans don’t need to see real evidence of a break down in order to prevent a break down.”

Earlier in the day, Bush argued that jittery U.S. taxpayers will benefit from a number of safeguards that lawmakers wrote into the pending legislation during weekend negotiations on Capitol Hill, including checks and balances on the operation of the program.

Supporters — even Republicans — said they didn’t like the bailout but didn’t want to play with history or risk an economic collapse.

“I’m not willing to put that bullet in the revolver and spin it. I will take the political risk,” said Rep. Spencer Bachus, R-Ala., the ranking member of the House Financial Services Committee.

“We’re all worried about losing our jobs,” said Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., before the vote. “Most of us say, ‘I want this thing to pass, but I want you to vote for it — not me.’

“We’re in this moment, and if we fail to do the right thing, Heaven help us,” he said.

Bush used a four-minute speech at the White House to try to assure Americans that the plan is good for the country.

“I’m confident that this rescue plan along with other measures taken by the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve will begin to restore strength and stability to America’s financial system and overall economy,” Bush said. “And I’m confident in that in long run, America will overcome these challenges and remain the most dynamic and productive economy in the world.”

Source

Read Full Post »

So what did people think about the first debate?

Here’s the Obama campaign’s official statement about their candidate’s performance:

“This was a clear victory for Barack Obama on John McCain’s home turf. Senator McCain offered nothing but more of the same failed Bush policies, and Barack Obama made a forceful case for change in our economy and our foreign policy. While Senator McCain wants to keep giving huge tax cuts to corporations and said nothing about the challenges Americans are facing in their daily lives, Barack Obama will be a fierce advocate for tax cuts for the middle class, affordable health care, and a new energy economy that creates millions of jobs. While foreign policy was supposed to be John McCain’s top issue, Barack Obama commanded that part of the debate with a clear call to responsibly end a misguided war in Iraq so that we can finish the fight against al Qaeda in Afghanistan. John McCain needed a game-changer tonight, and by any measure he didn’t get it.” Obama-Biden campaign manager David Plouffe.

And the McCain campaign’s take:

“There was one man who was presidential tonight, that man was John McCain. There was another who was political, that was Barack Obama. John McCain won this debate and controlled the dialogue throughout, whether it was the economy, taxes, spending, Iraq or Iran. There was a leadership gap, a judgment gap, and a boldness gap on display tonight, a fact Barack Obama acknowledged when he said John McCain was right at least five times. Tonight’s debate showed John McCain in command of the issues and presenting a clear agenda for America’s future.” –Jill Hazelbaker, McCain-Palin 2008 Communications Director

Read Full Post »

Interview with Larry King And Chris Rock, he is for Obama, and he makes pretty damn good points. Vote for the person with one house, not 13…er…14…what? How many again?

KING: Obama and McCain at opposite ends of the table. What do you make of it?

ROCK: What do I make of it? If this was a boxing match, McCain would be holding.

KING: Holding on?

ROCK: Yes. It’s like he got hit really hard in the stomach like, ‘OK. I can’t let him go. He’s going to knock me out.’ So that’s what appears to be going on right now. Just a hold.

KING: Has the financial crisis affected you?

ROCK: Larry, I drove a cab over here tonight. When it’s over, I’m going to try to pick up some more fares. I’m losing everything, Larry.

KING: Really downtrodden?

ROCK: Yes, it’s real bad.

KING: Have HBO paid you already?

ROCK: They have paid me, but the money is worthless now. Haven’t you heard? Your money’s worth nothing.

KING: You must be … proud that at this stage in our history a black man is running for president on a major ticket.

ROCK: Um, you know what? I’m proud Barack Obama’s running for president. You know? If it was Flavor Flav, would I be proud? No. I don’t support Barack Obama because he’s black.

KING: I said just as a proud feeling. That’s normal.

ROCK: There’s a proud feeling because of the character of the man. You know, I was — I supported John Kerry and, you know — and what’s my man? Al Gore.

KING: Al Gore.

ROCK: But this guy seems to be a little bit more. He seems to have watched other peoples’ mistakes and, you know, seems to have a little bit more going on.

KING: From a comedic stand point, who is funnier, McCain or Obama? Seriously. Is Obama not — it’s hard to be funny about Obama?

ROCK: No, no. It’s weird. People ask me that all the time. … McCain jokes are just easy jokes, like I don’t want a president with a bucket list. That’s like a McCain joke. Those jokes are easy. It’s like you basically, you know, you know, take the dust off your Reagan jokes and tell them again. You know?

But Obama, oh, this is a whole new set of jokes. I got to find a whole new move to the basket here. So I kind of hope he wins.

KING: Didn’t you introduce Obama at a rally?

ROCK: I introduced Obama at the Apollo Theater not too long ago. I think Obama would be great. I mean, just look the big thing right now is the economy. And people are going broke. And here: The choice isn’t Republican or Democrat. The choice is you got a guy that’s worth $150 million with 12 houses against a guy who’s worth a million dollars with one house.

KING: Well –

ROCK: The guy with one house really cares about losing a house, because he is homeless. The other guy can lose five houses and still got a bunch of houses. Does this make any sense? Am I the only one that sees this?

KING: It’s unique way of …

ROCK: I’m just saying, John McCain could lose half his houses.

KING: You got a point.

ROCK: And sleep well.

KING: You and Bill Clinton were on Letterman on Tuesday. You had some problems with the tone of his endorsement of Barack Obama. … Do you think Bill is hesitant about Barack Obama?

ROCK: You know what? You know, he did a great speech in Denver. And Hillary’s been on the campaign trail. Just at that moment, if you watched what happened on David Letterman, it appeared he was holding back. And when you tell a joke and everybody laughs, it is not because they disagree with what you’re saying. So –

KING: They get it?

ROCK: Yes, they get it. The whole audience was in on it. But, you know, hey, the guy’s in a weird position there. His wife ran for the thing and she didn’t win.

KING: The next night, on “The Daily Show,” Jon Stewart asked Clinton about the Letterman appearance and Clinton suggested that Obama supporters who questioned commitment are missing the point.

ROCK: It was great. It was great. And you’re right, [Obama] does need to get some of the votes that went to Hillary and all that. I don’t understand any Democrat that voted for Hillary that doesn’t support Obama. Because their views are pretty similar. You know what I mean? …

I understand people supporting Mr. McCain. But a Democrat that’s going to just be mad is — there’s something kind of really messed up about that.

KING: Have you always done political humor?

ROCK: You know –

KING: When you started, did you do politics?

ROCK: I’m interested in the world. Jon Stewart does political humor. Bill Maher does political humor. I talk about stuff the way guys would talk about it at the barber shop. I don’t belong on any panel on this show. You know what I mean? I don’t deserve to be near Roland Martin and Anderson Cooper and all these guys. I try to talk about politics in a way a guy that works at UPS would understand.

KING: You did a lot of Brooklyn stuff.

ROCK: I do all sorts of stuff, Larry. All sorts of stuff. You know, I hope Obama wins just because, you know, the country needs it. The country needs a change. We kind of seen what this whole McCain thing is. And I’ll go with the guy with one house. The guy with one house is scared about losing his house.

KING: I never thought of it that way.

ROCK: It is that simple.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.